Loading YouTube
On this episode of The Sideline...
Episode overview
Should the College Football Playoff committee trust analytics or the eye test? The Sideline debates playoff resumes, conference strength, seeding incentives, and whether avoiding a conference championship game can improve a contender's path. The hosts compare playoff resumes, conference strength, strength of schedule, and the incentives created by seeding rules. Their debate asks whether a championship game should reward a contender or expose it to risks that a similarly qualified team may be allowed to avoid.
The eye test needs evidence
The College Football Playoff committee must compare teams with different schedules, conferences and losses. The hosts debate whether visual dominance can outweigh measurable results when the final field is built.
Resumes are only as strong as the details
Notre Dame, Texas A&M and the ACC contenders raise questions about opponent quality and consistency. Looking past the logo requires examining who a team played, where it played and how convincingly it performed.
Conference championships create a dilemma
A title-game appearance offers a trophy and stronger resume, but it also adds injury risk and another possible loss. The episode asks whether finishing just outside the game can create an easier playoff path.
The eye test needs evidence
The College Football Playoff committee must compare teams with different schedules, conferences and losses. The hosts debate whether visual dominance can outweigh measurable results when the final field is built.
Hosted by
Open this episode
Video episodesLive
YouTubeFull episodes, clips, and visual segments from the show.
Video and audioLive
SpotifyStream video and audio episodes, follow the show, and keep new releases in your queue.
Podcast appsLive
Apple PodcastsSubscribe in the Apple ecosystem and keep new episodes in your queue.
Smart speaker readyUnavailable
Amazon MusicUse Amazon Music to listen across devices and smart speakers.
Keep Exploring